Al criteria and shows how Web pages 2 and 3 could continue in the
Al criteria and shows how Internet sites two and 3 could continue in the assessment as they met all crucial criteria.Table 1. A table with the crucial criteria determined by which all candidate websites will be evaluated separately and an instance of how the websites could be excluded or move on with the assessment (personal elaboration). Web-site 1 Accessibility 3D model Infrastructure to host the apps Tourism infrastructure Access for the location Other attractions Diving centers x x x x Web page two Web site three SiteThe critical criteria would narrow down the candidate internet sites as noticed on Table 1, and in case that there was additional than one particular web-site that met all criteria, the MNITMT References Sarcophagi Methoni columns Lavreotiki MakronisosWest Pagasetic Gulf North Sporades North Sporades North Sporades North Sporades Peloponnese Peloponnese Attica AtticaThe 12 AUCHS have been topic towards the first degree of elimination assessment depending on the important criteria, as noticed in Table 4 beneath. As clearly shown on Table 4, there was only 1 web site that met each of the criteria, and therefore the second-level assessment process was not important. As a result, the site that was selected in Greece.
