Rnary binders currently talked about, the diffusion coefficient was reduced at 250 days in comparison with reference mortars. Lastly, at that final age, L mortars presented the highest value of this coefficient.three.3. Water absorption The results of water absorption following immersion are depicted in Figure four. A slight decrease with time of this parameter was noted for all the mortars studied. Generally, eight of couple of differences involving the analyzed binders were observed at 28 and 250 days regard- 19 ing the water absorption after immersion.AbsorptionMaterials 2021, 14,Absorption immediately after immersion,10 8 six 4 228d 250d28d 250d 28d 250d28d 250d28d 250d28d 250d28d 250dMaterials 2021, 14, 5937 REFLSFSLSFFL9 ofFigure 4. Final results of absorption soon after immersion noted for the studied series. Figure 4. Final results of absorption after immersion noted for the studied series.3.four. Steady-State Chloride Diffusion CoefficientDiffusion coef.Cl Diffusion coef., x-28d250dREFThe benefits of steady-state chloride diffusion coefficient obtained from sample’s re28d sistivity for the analyzed mortars is usually observed in Figure five. Each of the binary and ternary 28d 28d binders studied showed greater values of this parameter at 28 days when compared with the ref28d erence specimens. The highest diffusion coefficients at that age were noted for F and L 28d series, followed by the 3 ternary binders analyzed (SL, SF, and FL series). On the 28d other hand, the lowest 28-days worth of this parameter for mortars with additions cor250d responded towards the S series. Amongst 28 and 250 days, the diffusion coefficient decreased for all of the mortars studied, and this reduction was extra noticeable for all those which PF-06873600 In stock incorporate at the least one particular active addition inside the binder (S, F, SF, SL, and FL series). The lowest coefficient at 250 days was noted for F and SF mortars, closely followed by S and FL ones, while it was slightly greater for SL series. In250d addition, for all of the binary and ternary binders currently described, the diffusion coefficient was lower at 250 days in comparison 250d 250d with reference mortars. Lastly, at that last age, L mortars presented the highest value of 250d 250d this coefficient.L S F SL SF FL-m /sFigure five. Steady-state chloride diffusion coefficient benefits obtained for the analyzed mortars. Figure five. Steady-state chloride diffusion coefficient final results obtained for the analyzed mortars.3.5. Carbonation Front Depth 3.five. Carbonation Front Depth The depths of carbonation front obtained forfor the studied bindersrepresented within the depths of carbonation front obtained the studied binders are are represented in Figure Reference mortars showed the lowest carbonation front depths at 28 days, folFigure six. six. Reference mortars showed the lowest carbonation front depths at 28 days, followed by ones, whereas these depths werewere greater for the other binders studied, lowed by S S ones, whereas these depths greater for the other binders studied, but but with slight differences amongst them. From 28 D-Fructose-6-phosphate disodium salt Autophagy todays,days, the carbonation depths with slight variations among them. From 28 to 250 250 the carbonation depths inincreased for all of the analyzed mortars.250 days, this parameter was once again reduced for REFfor creased for all of the analyzed mortars. At At 250 days, this parameter was once more decrease REF series, in comparison to the binders with additions. The highest carbonation depths that series, compared to the binders with additions. The highest carbonation depths at at that age were noted for the binary binders, par.
