Ulls spent drastically much more time brows0.050) 4). Inside the In season, bulls spent significantly far more time browsing then p 0.050) 16.859, p 0.050) (Figure 4). Within the dry season, bulls spent substantially extra time brow ing then (n = 408,(n == 401, t-value t-value = 40.726, p 0.050) (Figure 4). Similarly, the six 408, df grazing grazing df grazing = 401, = 40.726, p t-value = (Figure p 0.050) (Figure six Similarly, the ing then (n = 408, df = 401, 0.050) 40.726, four). Similarly, the 4). bulls bulls spent substantially more grazing more than browsing within the wet season (n = 448, df = 441, (n = 448, df spent substantially more time time grazing more than browsing within the wet season wet season = = 448, d bulls spent drastically far more time grazing over browsing within the (n 441, t-value= 39.239,0.050) (Figure 4). 4). p t-value= 39.239, t-value=0.050) (Figure 441, p 39.239, p 0.050) (Figure 4).Figure four. Boxplot depicting the percentage time spent foraging (broken down into grazing and browsing) in the dry Figure 4. Boxplot depicting the percentage time spent foraging (broken down into grazing and browsing) inside the dry and wet season. Number ofFigure four. Boxplot depicting the percentage time spent foragingbetween groups. observations = 428. Indicates statistically substantial differences (broken down into grazing and wet season. Number of observations and wetIndicates Number of observations = 428. Indicates groups. and browsing) inside the dry = 428. season. statistically significant variations among statistically significant differences amongst groups.Animals 2021, 11, 3070 Animals 2021, 11, 3070 Animals 2021, 11,8 of 13 8 13 eight ofof3.two. Association 3.2. Association three.two. Association Lone elephant bulls spent considerably far more time foraging when when compared with focal Lone elephant bulls spent considerably additional time foraging when in comparison to focal Lone elephant bulls spent drastically much more time foraging when in comparison with focal bulls who were foraging alongside females, no matter whether or not other males had been present bulls who were foraging alongside females, Taurohyodeoxycholic acid custom synthesis irrespective of regardless of whether other males had been prebulls who have been foraging alongside females, irrespective of irrespective of whether other males were preor not (nnot (n = 428, df =t-value = 33.790, p 0.050)0.050) (Figure five). When thebulls have been = 428, df = 417, (Figure five). When sent or not (n = 428, df = 417, t-value = 33,790, p 0.050) (Figure five). the focal focal bulls sent or 417, t-value = 33,790, p When the focal bulls within the in the Gisadenafil Phosphodiesterase (PDE) presence of bulls, in addition they spent drastically a lot more time foraging compared had been presence of other other bulls, in addition they spent significantly extra time foraging comwere within the presence of other bulls, additionally they spent considerably a lot more time foraging comto once they were related to females (no matter no matter if or not or notbulls were pared to when they had been related to females (no matter whether or not other other bulls pared to after they had been linked to females (irrespective of no matter whether or not other bulls present along along females) (n = 428, 428, df = 417, t-value 34.071, p p 0.050)(Figure 5). 417, t-value = 0.050) have been present with with females) (n = df = df = 417, t-value= 34,071, 0.050)(Figure five). had been present as well as females) (n = 428, = 34,071, p (Figure five). A lot more particularly, focal bulls did not spend drastically extra or less time grazing when Additional specifically, focal bulls didn’t spend substantially additional or much less time grazing when A lot more particularly, focal bulls didn’t devote signi.
