Vince of Ragusa. On the other hand, this percentage dropped to 48.47 when presented with the hypothesis that the plant be installed close to the town of Ragusa. Disapproval on the proposal was motivated by the adverse influence on the landscape (85.45 ), people today not wanting wind farms near their house (e.g., NIMBY syndrome) (36.62 ), the disturbance triggered by shovels to grazing animals (28.64 ), the damage to birds (27.27 ), the subtraction of space for agriculture (21.13 ), plus the noise created by the blades (20.66 ). 16.43 on the interviewees stated that their judgment depended on the form of plant made, when only 1.41 of the interviewees declared themselves indifferent for the problem. SSR69071 site Benefits suggested the existence of various groups of respondents with different preferences. In specific, we identified the presence of a segment of locals appreciating the conservation of rural landscape. Even though this group will not refuse in general the installation of wind farms, it regrets them when they must take spot inside the rural area from the Ibleo plateau. Additionally, results indicated only partially that the opposition at the plant of turbines could possibly be motivated by the NIMBY syndrome. Respondents’ opinions concerning the protection of your Ibleo plateau rural landscape are reported in Figure two, which highlights motivations connected to each use and non-use values.Sustainability 2021, 13,ten ofFigure two. Stated motives to guard the rural landscape from the Ibleo plateau.Answers for the distinct question in regards to the proposal with regards to the installation of a wind farm inside the Ibleo plateau near the town of Heliosupine N-oxide manufacturer Ragusa permitted us to discriminate among the sample in two sets. The very first one was composed of respondents who show additional preferences for the protection from the Ibleo landscape (52 ). The second one incorporated those who, rather, take into consideration extra it significant to lower GHG emissions (48 ). Table 5 reports the coefficient’ estimates associated towards the Probit 1 model (see Figure 1), which was implemented to identify explanatory variables segmenting the entire sample into the two already-mentioned sub-samples. Some variables are very important (with p 0.001) and relate to understanding of wind farm ahead of the survey, even though it was observed by a photo or on Tv, and the age of respondents. Each these variables show a positive effect around the acceptance in the installation with the wind farm in the Ibleo plateau near the town of Ragusa. Other substantial (p 0.01) aspects that positively have an effect on the acceptance of the wind farm are getting a natural tourist, the amount of minors in the family members, and revenue; the educational level alternatively negatively impacts the respondent’s opinion concerning the installation from the wind farm. Moreover, the opinion that the collectivity ought to shield the rural landscape even if this includes significant price positively affects the acceptance with the plant of the wind farm. Nearly all of the items proposed to determine high priority components that must be deemed to maintain the neighborhood rural landscape (e.g., maintenance and conservation of the standard components from the landscape like dry stone walls, rural buildings, carob trees, forestation, and an increase in grazing location) considerably (p 0.05) and positively have an effect on the accordance for the installation from the wind farm, suggesting that this installation will not be regarded as specifically harmful for the common elements from the Ibleo plateau. The only exception concerns the removal of disfiguring elements that opposi.
