His procedure.Methodsrepresentingandof the corresponding schools inside the nation), situated in eight cities (Barranquilla, Bogota, Cali, Cartagena, Ibague, Manizales, Medellin, and Santa Marta). The vast majority had been physicians (versus nurses and psychologists) with many backgrounds and knowledge (geriatrics, Pc, loved ones medicine, ethics, education, and psychotherapy).Phase : Preparatory phase for the participantsUsing the IAHPC List of Essential Practices (LEP) and the Recommendation of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) for the Development of Undergraduate Curricula in Palliative Medicine, relevant subject places were identified and classified in four thematic fields (see Box). Two weeks prior to the meeting, participants selected their best preferred fields then divided among 
the groups in line with their preferences. Participants who did not give a preference had been assigned based on the composition of the groups, resulting in 4 groups every single consisting of nine persons. At that time, also for the sources listed above (WHA resolution, EAPC curriculum, and IAHPC LEP), other publications,, and relevant material had been produced offered to all participants via a shared Dropbox folder.Phase : WorkshopDuring the very first part of the workshop, presentations have been provided by the authors describing the project background information and facts with all the following topics: – WHA Computer resolution, emphasizing the recommendations and member states obligations regarding Computer education of overall health professionals – Computer education in Germany and Argentina as sources of comparison – Computer in Colombia, highlighting the importance of MedChemExpress IPI-145 R enantiomer getting wellness care pros with all the competencies to appropriately manage, treat, and refer sufferers – Legal framework in Colombia concerning the provision of Pc (Ley Consuelo Devis Saavedra) – Amount of AZ876 site student comfort relating to Computer education in their very own universities as primarily based on a survey and report prepared by the authors immediately after the visits described inside the introduction section – IAHPC LEP: improvement and application – Resources from other professional associations: EAPC core curriculum and EAPC core competencies Directions around the approach were presented and explained. The lead question was to determine in each and every of these thematic PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27083499?dopt=Abstract fields what needs to be performed by a general practitioner nurse caring to get a patient with Computer desires. Within the thematic fields, participants were asked to Make a decision whether or not the topics integrated in every field have been appropriate Add new topics if they considered any were missing Pick the acceptable amount of intervention (diagnosis and referral or diagnosis and therapy) for every single subject Participants in each group were given eight hours to discuss and make suggestions to become presented to each of the participants. The authors remained within the room, facilitating the discussions and answering inquiries from the participants.This project was developed and implemented through the phases described below.Phase : Choice of participantsAn invitation to participate in a workshop to recognize competencies for the undergraduate level in medical and nursing schools was sent through e-mail to deans and chiefs of health-related and nursing programs of universities. The invitation described the objectives in the workshop and invited two representatives of each and every university: a teacherprofessor in Pc plus a person accountable for curricula improvement. The invitation integrated the dates and place as well as confirmation that the travel, a.His procedure.Methodsrepresentingandof the corresponding schools in the nation), situated in eight cities (Barranquilla, Bogota, Cali, Cartagena, Ibague, Manizales, Medellin, and Santa Marta). The vast majority had been physicians (versus nurses and psychologists) with numerous backgrounds and knowledge (geriatrics, Pc, household medicine, ethics, education, and psychotherapy).Phase : Preparatory phase for the participantsUsing the IAHPC List of Necessary Practices (LEP) as well as the Recommendation from the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) for the Improvement of Undergraduate Curricula in Palliative Medicine, relevant subject locations had been identified and classified in 4 thematic fields (see Box). Two weeks prior to the meeting, participants selected their top preferred fields and then divided amongst the groups as outlined by their preferences. Participants who did not give a preference had been assigned according to the composition on the groups, resulting in four groups every consisting of nine persons. At that time, moreover towards the resources listed above (WHA resolution, EAPC curriculum, and IAHPC LEP), other publications,, and relevant material were produced offered to all participants by means of a shared Dropbox folder.Phase : WorkshopDuring the initial a part of the workshop, presentations were provided by the authors describing the project background information using the following topics: – WHA Computer resolution, emphasizing the suggestions and member states obligations regarding Computer education of health pros – Pc education in Germany and Argentina as sources of comparison – Computer in Colombia, highlighting the value of having well being care professionals together with the competencies to appropriately handle, treat, and refer sufferers – Legal framework in Colombia relating to the provision of Computer (Ley Consuelo Devis Saavedra) – Degree of student comfort concerning Pc education in their own universities as primarily based on a survey and report prepared by the authors soon after the visits 
described within the introduction section – IAHPC LEP: improvement and application – Sources from other professional associations: EAPC core curriculum and EAPC core competencies Directions on the process have been presented and explained. The lead query was to recognize in every single of those thematic PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27083499?dopt=Abstract fields what need to be performed by a general practitioner nurse caring for any patient with Computer wants. Within the thematic fields, participants have been asked to Decide regardless of whether the subjects included in each and every field had been suitable Add new subjects if they viewed as any have been missing Choose the acceptable amount of intervention (diagnosis and referral or diagnosis and treatment) for each and every topic Participants in every group were offered eight hours to talk about and make suggestions to be presented to all the participants. The authors remained within the space, facilitating the discussions and answering inquiries in the participants.This project was developed and implemented via the phases described under.Phase : Selection of participantsAn invitation to take part in a workshop to determine competencies for the undergraduate level in medical and nursing schools was sent by means of e-mail to deans and chiefs of health-related and nursing applications of universities. The invitation described the objectives of your workshop and invited two representatives of each university: a teacherprofessor in Computer plus a particular person responsible for curricula improvement. The invitation integrated the dates and place at the same time as confirmation that the travel, a.
