Ulls spent significantly additional time brows0.050) 4). Inside the In season, bulls spent considerably a lot more time browsing then p 0.050) 16.859, p 0.050) (Figure four). Within the dry season, bulls spent substantially far more time brow ing then (n = 408,(n == 401, t-value t-value = 40.726, p 0.050) (Figure four). Similarly, the six 408, df grazing grazing df grazing = 401, = 40.726, p t-value = (Figure p 0.050) (Figure six Similarly, the ing then (n = 408, df = 401, 0.050) 40.726, four). Similarly, the 4). bulls bulls spent substantially much more grazing over browsing inside the wet season (n = 448, df = 441, (n = 448, df spent significantly far more time time grazing more than browsing in the wet season wet season = = 448, d bulls spent drastically much more time grazing more than browsing within the (n 441, t-value= 39.239,0.050) (Figure 4). 4). p t-value= 39.239, t-value=0.050) (Figure 441, p 39.239, p 0.050) (Figure four).Figure 4. Boxplot depicting the percentage time spent foraging (broken down into grazing and browsing) in the dry Figure 4. Boxplot depicting the percentage time spent foraging (broken down into grazing and browsing) in the dry and wet season. Quantity ofFigure four. Boxplot depicting the percentage time spent foragingbetween groups. observations = 428. Indicates statistically important variations (broken down into grazing and wet season. Number of observations and wetIndicates Quantity of observations = 428. Indicates groups. and browsing) within the dry = 428. season. statistically important differences amongst statistically considerable variations involving groups.Animals 2021, 11, 3070 Animals 2021, 11, 3070 Animals 2021, 11,8 of 13 eight 13 8 ofof3.two. Association 3.2. Association three.two. Association Lone elephant bulls spent considerably extra time foraging when when compared with focal Lone elephant bulls spent significantly more time foraging when when compared with focal Lone elephant bulls spent significantly far more time foraging when in comparison with focal bulls who were foraging alongside females, regardless of regardless of Lesogaberan supplier whether other males were present bulls who had been foraging alongside females, Nitrocefin Protocol irrespective of regardless of whether other males have been prebulls who were foraging alongside females, irrespective of whether other males have been preor not (nnot (n = 428, df =t-value = 33.790, p 0.050)0.050) (Figure 5). When thebulls have been = 428, df = 417, (Figure 5). When sent or not (n = 428, df = 417, t-value = 33,790, p 0.050) (Figure 5). the focal focal bulls sent or 417, t-value = 33,790, p When the focal bulls in the within the presence of bulls, they also spent substantially extra time foraging compared were presence of other other bulls, they also spent considerably a lot more time foraging comwere inside the presence of other bulls, in addition they spent considerably a lot more time foraging comto when they were connected with females (irrespective of no matter whether or not or notbulls were pared to when they were associated with females (regardless of no matter if other other bulls pared to after they were related to females (irrespective of irrespective of whether or not other bulls present along along females) (n = 428, 428, df = 417, t-value 34.071, p p 0.050)(Figure 5). 417, t-value = 0.050) were present with with females) (n = df = df = 417, t-value= 34,071, 0.050)(Figure 5). have been present in addition to females) (n = 428, = 34,071, p (Figure five). Far more particularly, focal bulls did not commit considerably more or significantly less time grazing when Much more particularly, focal bulls did not spend drastically extra or much less time grazing when Far more especially, focal bulls did not devote signi.
