G (see Eq. two) of all players in that bin is determined
G (see Eq. two) of all players in that bin is determined and represented because the colour of the bin. If no player having a certain combination of achievementfactors is located, the corresponding bin is empty, and also the bin colour is white. From Fig. 6 and Tab. PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367588 two we come across the influence and significance of the a variety of factors: Age is usually a important factor (significance level beneath ) at 4 out of the 5 time points. The adverse coefficient seems to be in contrast for the raise of wealth with age noticed in Fig. four. The explanation is that total activity, which is most strongly correlated with wealth, is limited by age. This induces the spurious correlation amongst wealth and age observed in Fig. four. Faction rank is often a important good aspect for wealth having a significance level 
below 0.0 for all days. High faction rank implies “political” influence inside the game. Players which might be in no faction, i.e. significantly less social, possess the smallest possible value as factionrank and are on average poorer. Figure six A shows that a higher faction rank correlates strongly with wealthgain. We also see that the nonempty bins recommend a strong correlation amongst XP and faction rank. XP is substantially constructive for wealth around the very first two sample days with continually decreasing coefficient, altering sign on the last two days. This could possibly indicate that XP is positive up to a specific extent, following which the purpose of high XP begins to contradict the goal of higher wealth. In Fig. six A, the information from all five days are combined, along with the positive and adverse correlations of XP cancel and leave no significant effect of XP on wealthgains. Combat skill has a correlation with wealth equivalent to XP, see Tab. two. We see in Fig. 6 B that combat skill is roughly proportional for the logarithm of XP. There’s a significant fraction of rich people today with low combat skill of about 20. Figure 6 C shows no correlation among combat skill and wealthgains.Figure 7. Wealth and also other properties as a function of alliance size. We bin players as outlined by the size of your alliance they belong to, and show several properties as a function of alliance size: A wealth, B age, C wealthgain, D combat talent, E farming ability, F faction rank. 1st bin are players in no alliance, second bin are players in an alliance of size two. Clearly members of those smallest alliances show low wealth and achievement measures. Also for the largest groups, reduced levels are observable. Error bars denote the common errors of these suggests (assuming Gaussian distributions). The black dashed line shows the typical more than all players in an alliance with a minimum of 3 members. Data are taken each 240 days (see Solutions). doi:0.37journal.pone.003503.gPLOS A single plosone.orgBehavioral and Network Origins of Wealth InequalityFigure 8. Wealthgain as a function of network properties. Colour represents the logarithm with the wealthgain, log0 (g), from blue (lowest) to red (highest), empty bins are white. A trade in and outdegree, B trade undirected degree and nearestneighbor degree, C trade undirected degree and clustering coefficient, D friend in and outdegree, E enmity in and outdegree, F enmity undirected degree and nearestneighbor degree. Data are taken just about every 240 days (see Solutions). doi:0.37journal.pone.003503.gFarming ability features a consistently good and mainly significant correlation with wealth. Farming ability is associated with the collection of sources, which purchase C-DIM12 generates revenue. Figure 6 C also suggests an association involving higher farming.
