Iables, all with density p(z) but with different parameters u
Iables, all with density p(z) but with different parameters u, as in Figure 1b.The dataTo assess this hypothesis, we need to choose two genomes that are closely enough related that a comparison of gene expression still carries a signal of events in their recent evolutionary divergence, but distant enough so that there are numerous rearrangement breakpoints in their genomic alignment. For our purposes, we should also have relations of orthology established across the two genomes. Of the many expression databases available, there are few that satisfy these criteria. In the future, however, we can expect many more evolutionoriented genome-wide expression projects and this motivates our preliminary study. The present study is confined to two comparisons, one of the human and macaque genomes and gene expression in whole blood samples, and the second of human and chimp genomes and gene expression in cerebral cortex tissue. The tools we use to analyze these data, however, are applicable to much wider datasets.The gene expression dataResultsThe null hypothesisWere there no association between breakpoint creation and change of expression of neighbouring genes, we would expect changed-expression genes to be spatially distributed independently of breakpoint positions.The gene expression data: whole blood tissue Dillman et al. [10] analyzed whole blood tissue in human and three closely related non-human primates (NHP) namely the rhesus macaque, the cynomologous macaque, and the green african monkey. Each of their probe sets was defined by 54,000 probes, representing 38,500 genes from the completely sequenced human genome (2004 release).Mu z and Sankoff BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13(Suppl 3):S6 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/S3/SPage 3 ofFigure 1 Null hypotheses. a) Distribution of z = log distance to nearest breakpoint, under the null hypothesis, with u = e16. b) Predicted empirical frequency distribution, based on equally weighted u = 15, 16, 17.The gene expression profiles for non-human primates (NHP) and human whole blood tissue were compared using a variety of statistical techniques (principal components, hierarchical clustering, analysisof variance) in order to find genes differentially UNC0642 price expressed in humans and NHPs. The results include genetic elements identified as genes, mRNAs and ESTs.Mu z and Sankoff BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13(Suppl 3):S6 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/S3/SPage 4 ofNote that where these data tell us a gene is expressed more in one genome than the other, it does not tell us whether expression increased in the first genome PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26226583 since divergence from a common ancestor, or whether it decreased in the other. We extracted 317 genetic elements with significant fold change from this table to use in testing our hypotheses. It is important to note that there is no gene coordinate or BPR information in the gene expression database. Thus, the crux of our investigation is to relate these unpositioned expression data associated with gene names to the breakpoint data, which is simply positional, with no gene names. To do so, we require a database containing both name and positions of human genes. The gene expression data: cerebral cortex tissue The second case study is confined to the comparison of the chimpanzee and human genomes and gene expression in brain tissue. It is based on a separate study by C eres et al. [11] where they analyzed brain tissue in human, chimpanzee and rhesus macaque using rhesus macaque as an out.
