Han the control participants. Given the differences in age and walking speed between the cohorts, it is difficult to determine whether the reported differences in acceleration profiles were indicative of disease-related changes or whether they werePLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0123705 April 20,14 /Wearable Sensors for Assessing Balance and Gait in Parkinson’s DiseaseTable 2. Summarises and defines the sensor-based measures of standing balance and walking order Quisinostat stability used in the studies included in this review. Outcome Measure Standing Balance or Walking Stability Mean acceleration The average of the anteroposterior (AP), mediolateral (ML) or vertical (VT) accelerations during a specific phase of the movement. ICG-001 price Provides an indication of the rate of change in the velocity of the body during this phase. Under static conditions, larger values would represent poorer control. Taking the RMS of the accelerations makes all values of the time series positive, to yield an average positive amplitude for AP, ML or VT accelerations. Like mean accelerations, RMS accelerations provides an indication of the rate of change in velocity, but is more robust for data that has both positive and negative values. Time series of the first derivative of acceleration (third derivative of displacement), representing the rate of change of acceleration. It is calculated from the raw AP, ML or VT accelerations. During steady movements, the body should be neither accelerating nor decelerating rapidly, hence Jerk scores should be smaller for more stable people. Similar to RMS accelerations, RMS Jerk mathematically converts all values to a positive number and provides an average value for the AP, ML and VT Jerk time series. In lay terms, the RMS Jerk provides a single value that describes the jerkiness of the movement. RMS Jerk score divided by overall movement time. Provides similar information to RMS Jerk, but takes into account differences in task duration for different populations. The resultant of AP and ML displacement is calculated for an inertial measurement unit placed at the height of the centre of mass (COM; 55 of height). Maximum sway distance is the single largest value recorded throughout the trial. Provides insight into the extremes of postural sway. The resultant of AP and ML displacement is calculated for an inertial measurement unit placed at the height of the COM (55 of height). Mean sway distance is the average of all resultant values recorded throughout the trial. Larger values represent poorer postural control. The overall range of displacement of the centre of mass (COM; estimated from an inertial measurement unit positioned on the trunk) in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions. Larger values represent an increased amount of postural sway. The total distance travelled by the COM on the transverse plane. Increased length of sway indicates more sway per unit of time and, hence, reduced postural control. The first integral of the AP, ML or VT acceleration signals. Higher sway velocities represent more erratic postural adjustments and, hence, poorer postural control. The elliptical area that encapsulates the sway path derived from the AP and ML accelerations. Larger sway areas represent an increased volume of sway, which may suggest poorer balance. The frequency below which 95 of the acceleration signals power is present. Higher frequencies would represent a larger number of postural adjustments to maintain balance during th.Han the control participants. Given the differences in age and walking speed between the cohorts, it is difficult to determine whether the reported differences in acceleration profiles were indicative of disease-related changes or whether they werePLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0123705 April 20,14 /Wearable Sensors for Assessing Balance and Gait in Parkinson’s DiseaseTable 2. Summarises and defines the sensor-based measures of standing balance and walking stability used in the studies included in this review. Outcome Measure Standing Balance or Walking Stability Mean acceleration The average of the anteroposterior (AP), mediolateral (ML) or vertical (VT) accelerations during a specific phase of the movement. Provides an indication of the rate of change in the velocity of the body during this phase. Under static conditions, larger values would represent poorer control. Taking the RMS of the accelerations makes all values of the time series positive, to yield an average positive amplitude for AP, ML or VT accelerations. Like mean accelerations, RMS accelerations provides an indication of the rate of change in velocity, but is more robust for data that has both positive and negative values. Time series of the first derivative of acceleration (third derivative of displacement), representing the rate of change of acceleration. It is calculated from the raw AP, ML or VT accelerations. During steady movements, the body should be neither accelerating nor decelerating rapidly, hence Jerk scores should be smaller for more stable people. Similar to RMS accelerations, RMS Jerk mathematically converts all values to a positive number and provides an average value for the AP, ML and VT Jerk time series. In lay terms, the RMS Jerk provides a single value that describes the jerkiness of the movement. RMS Jerk score divided by overall movement time. Provides similar information to RMS Jerk, but takes into account differences in task duration for different populations. The resultant of AP and ML displacement is calculated for an inertial measurement unit placed at the height of the centre of mass (COM; 55 of height). Maximum sway distance is the single largest value recorded throughout the trial. Provides insight into the extremes of postural sway. The resultant of AP and ML displacement is calculated for an inertial measurement unit placed at the height of the COM (55 of height). Mean sway distance is the average of all resultant values recorded throughout the trial. Larger values represent poorer postural control. The overall range of displacement of the centre of mass (COM; estimated from an inertial measurement unit positioned on the trunk) in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions. Larger values represent an increased amount of postural sway. The total distance travelled by the COM on the transverse plane. Increased length of sway indicates more sway per unit of time and, hence, reduced postural control. The first integral of the AP, ML or VT acceleration signals. Higher sway velocities represent more erratic postural adjustments and, hence, poorer postural control. The elliptical area that encapsulates the sway path derived from the AP and ML accelerations. Larger sway areas represent an increased volume of sway, which may suggest poorer balance. The frequency below which 95 of the acceleration signals power is present. Higher frequencies would represent a larger number of postural adjustments to maintain balance during th.
