Nline psychological interventions are also discussed. Conclusions Guidance on optimal ethical practice in e-health research is summarized. Key words e-health; ethical issues; online research methods; pain; pediatric; qualitative methods; randomized controlled trial; research PD325901 price design and methodology.Ethical Guidance for Pediatric e-Health Research Using Examples From Pain Research With AdolescentsE-health and e-technology are fast-growing research areas within health and pediatric psychology. Psychological research about pain, for example, has been delivered on mobile phone applications (Rosser Eccleston, 2011), websites (Stinson, Wilson, Gill, Yamada, Holt, 2009), and mobile technologies, such as tablet devices. Telecare and telemedicine advances are numerous and fastchanging, making them exciting, but difficult to track. However, legislation to encourage the ethical use of these technologies in social and psychological research is comparatively slow to keep pace with the innovations taking place in research methods and applications. This lag persists despite numerous attempts by professionalorganizations, such as the American Psychological Society (Kraut et al., 2004), the Association of Internet Researchers (Ess AoIR Ethics Working Committee, 2002), and the British Psychological Society (British Psychological Society, 2007) to develop working ethics policies for e-health research. Pragmatic guidance on ethical issues for consideration and action in the design, practice, and reporting of e-health research is difficult to find. A challenge exists for researchers engaged in online psychological research to develop an ethical framework based on best practice in traditional face-to-face research methods, and experiences from early adopters of e-health research. The primary aim of this manuscript is to address a gap in the literature by providing ethical guidance for psychologists engaged in pediatric e-health research. Ethical issues regarding recruitment, informed consent, debriefing,Journal of Pediatric Psychology 37(10) pp. 1116?126, 2012 doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jss085 Advance Access publication July 31, 2012 Journal of Pediatric Psychology vol. 37 no. 10 ?The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected] Guidance for Pediatric e-health Researchprivacy and confidentiality, participant safety, the delivery of psychological interventions online, and the reporting of online research will be discussed in the context of two exemplar studies: (1) an asynchronous focus group hosted on an online message board about how adolescents search for information and support about pain, called Let’s Chat Pain and (2) an internet intervention designed to teach cognitive and behavioral pain management strategies to adolescents with chronic pain and their parents, called Web-MAP. We chose these AZD4547 web studies because a concurrent challenge in both cases was to establish, with no clear precedent, appropriate website design and research methods that support ethical approaches to recruitment, informed consent, debriefing, privacy and confidentiality, participant safety, and the delivery of psychological interventions online. Although both exemplar studies are focused on pediatric pain populations, the ethical issues raised in each case are not unique to pediatric pain and are likely to be encountered in e-health research with.Nline psychological interventions are also discussed. Conclusions Guidance on optimal ethical practice in e-health research is summarized. Key words e-health; ethical issues; online research methods; pain; pediatric; qualitative methods; randomized controlled trial; research design and methodology.Ethical Guidance for Pediatric e-Health Research Using Examples From Pain Research With AdolescentsE-health and e-technology are fast-growing research areas within health and pediatric psychology. Psychological research about pain, for example, has been delivered on mobile phone applications (Rosser Eccleston, 2011), websites (Stinson, Wilson, Gill, Yamada, Holt, 2009), and mobile technologies, such as tablet devices. Telecare and telemedicine advances are numerous and fastchanging, making them exciting, but difficult to track. However, legislation to encourage the ethical use of these technologies in social and psychological research is comparatively slow to keep pace with the innovations taking place in research methods and applications. This lag persists despite numerous attempts by professionalorganizations, such as the American Psychological Society (Kraut et al., 2004), the Association of Internet Researchers (Ess AoIR Ethics Working Committee, 2002), and the British Psychological Society (British Psychological Society, 2007) to develop working ethics policies for e-health research. Pragmatic guidance on ethical issues for consideration and action in the design, practice, and reporting of e-health research is difficult to find. A challenge exists for researchers engaged in online psychological research to develop an ethical framework based on best practice in traditional face-to-face research methods, and experiences from early adopters of e-health research. The primary aim of this manuscript is to address a gap in the literature by providing ethical guidance for psychologists engaged in pediatric e-health research. Ethical issues regarding recruitment, informed consent, debriefing,Journal of Pediatric Psychology 37(10) pp. 1116?126, 2012 doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jss085 Advance Access publication July 31, 2012 Journal of Pediatric Psychology vol. 37 no. 10 ?The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected] Guidance for Pediatric e-health Researchprivacy and confidentiality, participant safety, the delivery of psychological interventions online, and the reporting of online research will be discussed in the context of two exemplar studies: (1) an asynchronous focus group hosted on an online message board about how adolescents search for information and support about pain, called Let’s Chat Pain and (2) an internet intervention designed to teach cognitive and behavioral pain management strategies to adolescents with chronic pain and their parents, called Web-MAP. We chose these studies because a concurrent challenge in both cases was to establish, with no clear precedent, appropriate website design and research methods that support ethical approaches to recruitment, informed consent, debriefing, privacy and confidentiality, participant safety, and the delivery of psychological interventions online. Although both exemplar studies are focused on pediatric pain populations, the ethical issues raised in each case are not unique to pediatric pain and are likely to be encountered in e-health research with.
